Dumbest argument yet against McCain's presidency:
« previous entry | next entry »
Feb. 28th, 2008 | 08:08 pm
From, of course, The New York Times: Ohmigod, he was born near the Panama Canal! (The headline actually makes you anticipate something a hell of a lot raunchier, until you realize that The New York Times was just talking about Panama.)
I'm sure that we can all think of lots of good reasons for McCain not to be president, but this isn't it, and indeed, it makes me itch again for a nice solid Constitutional Amendment allowing any U.S. citizen to run for president regardless of where said citizen was born. Admittedly, this does mean that Teh Terminator might become president, but it would also mean avoiding idiotic arguments like this one.
I'm sure that we can all think of lots of good reasons for McCain not to be president, but this isn't it, and indeed, it makes me itch again for a nice solid Constitutional Amendment allowing any U.S. citizen to run for president regardless of where said citizen was born. Admittedly, this does mean that Teh Terminator might become president, but it would also mean avoiding idiotic arguments like this one.

(no subject)
from:
hummingwolf
date: Feb. 29th, 2008 02:47 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Thread
(no subject)
from:
chattycatsmeow
date: Feb. 29th, 2008 03:29 am (UTC)
Link
(edited for a very unfortunate typo)
Edited at 2008-02-29 03:30 am (UTC)
Reply | Thread