Home

The surge that is Mike Gravel!

« previous entry | next entry »
Jan. 30th, 2008 | 07:12 am

So as you might have heard (right here on this blog, actually) Florida had a small little primary yesterday. But again, none of you want to know about that. What you want to know is what happened to our man Mike Gravel. After all, the strangeness that is Florida would seem to be a natural fit for the strangeness that is the rock-throwing Mike Gravel. Has he been able to follow his growing popularity, his surge of momentum, the love he generates through throwing rocks?

I am pleased to say a definite yes to this. As of 7:32 pm, the Florida Department of Elections, admittedly not one of the most reliable entities on the planet, reports that based on 99% of precincts reporting in, Mike Gravel has won a grand total of 5,236 votes, or .3% of the vote. The momentum is there, people, it's there. But in reading over the media coverage, I was shocked, shocked, to find that CNN and MSNBC, to name but two organizations, were maliciously and deliberately leaving this completely out of their coverage. This is CNN. Note that they continue to list Kucinich, who a) has dropped out of the race and b) actually got fewer votes than either Joe Biden or Bill Richardson, who also jumped out of the race. But do they mention Mike Gravel, who is still actively campaigning? No.

To somewhat balance this out, CNN also ignored the candidacy/votes for Alan Keyes, who, I was shocked to see, was actually listed on the Florida Republican ballot, despite being -- how do we put this -- certifiably nuts. (He received 3,980 votes, only beating out Tom Tancredo, who has also left the race.)

Oh media. We have given up on any hope for accuracy from you or any hope that any of you may learn math (Quote from last night: "John McCain won a sizeable majority...." Numbers from the Florida Department of Elections: 36%, a strong plurality and a definite win, but not a majority, sizeable or not.) But can we hold out any hope that your coverage will at least be complete?

On a related note, I am extremely displeased to note that, once again, the media started reporting Florida votes while people were still voting.. Florida stretches into two time zones, so the Panhandle continues to vote an hour after the rest of the state, and state law says that voters in line at 7 pm have the right to vote, which left some people in Broward and Miami-Dade (it's always Broward and Miami-Dade) voting right up until 8:25 pm, even after the media were reporting the numbers, and even after this sort of idiocy helped cause the confusion of the 2000 election. Media. I'm ok with waiting until everybody has voted before I find the results. That's kinda the point.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Comments {5}

Frank Di Vincenzo

(no subject)

from: [info]lordsnotrag
date: Jan. 30th, 2008 03:16 pm (UTC)
Link

This is the same press that declared a big victory for Clinton in NH, even though she won the same number of delegates as Obama there. Although, I did see a mention of Gravel on CNN. I can't find the quote anymore. But they quoted some Democratic leader as saying "Hillary's win in Florida will garner her the same number of delegates as Mike Gravel."

Reply | Thread

Mari Ness

(no subject)

from: [info]mariness
date: Jan. 30th, 2008 06:59 pm (UTC)
Link

It's a TIE!!!

I KNEW GRAVEL WAS DOING WELL!

Reply | Parent | Thread

josh

(no subject)

from: [info]dzuunmod
date: Jan. 30th, 2008 05:34 pm (UTC)
Link

To your last point, this is something that's been a fairly major issue in Canadian elections, as well. What usually happens on federal election days in the US in that regard?

For the longest time here on federal election days, the networks would go on the air hour-by-hour across the country as polling places closed. (So, if you were in Alberta, election coverage wouldn't start on your local station until 7pm local time or whenever, even though the coverage had already begun for viewers places east of you.) That worked fine until about three or four elections when someone - some random citizen - in Newfoundland or Nova Scotia started putting the early returns up on the Web.

That didn't make Elections Canada happy. So now we have a system where - if I remember correctly - the polling places across the country all close within an hour or so of one another even though we have five time zones in this country.

So, yeah - how does it work down your way?

Reply | Thread

josh

(no subject)

from: [info]dzuunmod
date: Jan. 30th, 2008 05:36 pm (UTC)
Link

Er, *three or four elections ago when someone

Reply | Parent | Thread

Mari Ness

(no subject)

from: [info]mariness
date: Jan. 30th, 2008 07:30 pm (UTC)
Link

On election night, all four networks, plus CNN and MSNBC and possibly a few others, will go to live election coverage, probably starting at seven, and start announcing and calling states as results come in.

This has been a major problem for years since Hawai'i and parts of Alaska are five to six hours behind the East Coast (I forget how Daylight Savings Time affects this since Hawai'i doesn't have Daylight Savings Time) and Hawai'i wants to keep their polls open until 7. In addition, our state covers two time zones, and one of the major screwups in the 2000 election was that the news called Florida WHILE PEOPLE WERE STILL VOTING, claiming that it wasn't a close vote, ha ha.

So far, though, we don't have any national, federal laws in place forcing polls to close at a certain time. I'm not sure we could, since these things are generally set by the state. And I'm not sure that a law muzzling the media would help either....or would be entirely legal, given the First Amendment. And since all the different networks are trying to be the "first to call" the election....

Reply | Parent | Thread