Home

Fundamental, overwhelming principles:

« previous entry | next entry »
May. 17th, 2007 | 09:30 am

[Disclaimer: this entry was originally typed in Microsoft Word with the grammar checker on.]

If I have been schooled in any moral issue whatsoever (and I can understand if you're under the impression that I haven't), it is this fundamental, overwhelming principle:

"Aren't I" is lousy English. It grates on the ears.

(And, I've just learned, completely acceptable to Microsoft Word's grammar check. Sigh. What evil times we live in.)

True, other fundamental, overwhelming principles that several well meaning people also attempted to instill in me (don't start sentences with the words "and," "but" or "because," don't stay up late watching Angel dvds when you have to head to Miami the following morning, and so on) have, alas, taken themselves away to the place where fundamental overwhelming principles go when they're being completely ignored. (It's near Washington, DC; they've put a retreat there, just for convenience.) Thus, if you ask me "Aren't I right about the South Beach diet?" my immediate instinctive response will be unrelated to diets or South Beach (although I may spare a thought or two to blame South Beach for keeping people too drunk and too happy to remember fundamental overwhelming principles or this sort), and will instead be "ouch," not entirely because of the phrase itself, but also because it conjures up a chorus of well meaning English teachers from my past all squeaking "Proper English! Proper English!" (They sound rather like deranged rabbits.) Don't blame me; blame my inability to shed all of my principles. Am I not to be pitied for this?

***********

On a completely different note, it's a bit disconcerting to watch a woman prattle happily about the wonder of "The Secret" (the new trendy thing where you think positive thoughts about what having exactly you want and then wow you actually get it, as demonstrated by its author who thought about it and now has lots of money) and how it's really changed things for her just that week and then watch her trip over and fall across a coffee table, quite painfully. Perhaps she wasn't thinking about it.


*I'll admit that, as grammar issues go, "Aren't I" may not rank up there with, say, "between you and I," [ok, seriously, Microsoft. You're letting that one go – oh, you just want me to remove the word "between." Fair enough, and I would, except that I'm illustrating a bad grammar point here. Moving on.]

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Comments {17}

josh

(no subject)

from: [info]dzuunmod
date: May. 17th, 2007 01:43 pm (UTC)
Link

On CBC Radio's local morning show today, they had an interview with a couple of locals who won $12 million in the lottery and claim it's thanks to The Secret. It wasn't nearly as critical as I would've hoped for from my public broadcaster.

And my mother's a believer, too. :/

Reply | Thread

Mari Ness

(no subject)

from: [info]mariness
date: May. 18th, 2007 02:30 am (UTC)
Link

Thing is, I can't help but think that if we all tried using the secret to win the lottery, there wouldn't be enough lottery tickets to go around.

Reply | Parent | Thread

josh

(no subject)

from: [info]dzuunmod
date: May. 18th, 2007 02:39 am (UTC)
Link

She made me watch the video, she did. And they do address that, but I guess I wasn't satisifed enough with their explanation enough to remember it. I *think* they went into something about how humans are different, and we're all going to use The Secret for different things. Some people will use it to heal their diseases, others to land the job they really want and other people still to get the winning lottery ticket.

But, the grander explanation was that the universe will find a way to deal with it. It provided us with The Secret, and it can't really be questioned.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Mari Ness

(no subject)

from: [info]mariness
date: May. 18th, 2007 02:40 am (UTC)
Link

But if so many of us know about it, how is it a secret anymore?

Reply | Parent | Thread

josh

(no subject)

from: [info]dzuunmod
date: May. 18th, 2007 02:46 am (UTC)
Link

Again, trying to remember the video, I think that's just the name of this thing, this concept that they say has existed forever. Until now though, it was something only the privileged few knew about. They listed off a bunch of names - maybe 20 or 30? - of famous historical figures that they claimed knew about and employed The Secret. These were big names, too - like on a par with Washington or Churchill, some of them.

I'm was (and am) as skeptical as you.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Mari Ness

(no subject)

from: [info]mariness
date: May. 18th, 2007 02:54 am (UTC)
Link

These are supposedly the "Secret" teachers:

http://thesecret.tv/behind-the-secret-teachers.html

One of them is John Hagelin. It's kinda nice to know that he's put aside his idea of becoming president through transcendental mediation and is now just earning lots of money instead, but you'd think that if this Secret thing worked, he'd be president instead of Dubya.

My gut instinct is telling me that I'm going to have to work tomorrow anyway, even if I have a secret wish not to.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Cold Echoes

By the way...

from: [info]coldecho
date: May. 17th, 2007 02:33 pm (UTC)
Link

Apparently, the rule about "not beginning a sentence with 'and,' 'but,' 'because,' or 'however'" has been relaxed or removed entirely. Then again, you demonstrated that yourself - it can be used as emphasis related to the preceeding statement(s). [Yes, you probably already knew that.]

And since we're talking about grammar: your parenthetical in the next to last paragraph was rearranged somehow... by Microsoft Word, I'm certain.

Lastly, on an unrelated note: The format of your livejournal is frustrating to commenters. Every time I comment on it, the "leave a comment" section that opens up is using a tiny font in a pale grey color. It is very difficult to see what I am typing, and consequently, difficult to correct errors. I have tried changing the "text size" of Internet Explorer, but it has no effect on this.

Sorry... I didn't mean to be chock full o' criticism! Just mentioning things.

Reply | Thread

Mari Ness

Re: By the way...

from: [info]mariness
date: May. 18th, 2007 02:32 am (UTC)
Link

Yeah, I know about the format problem. (I also don't like the way it displays my archives.) The thing is I'm using one of the LJ defaults, and one that I like, but I can't figure out how to go in and change the font size/color on the commenting thing.

My parenthetical in the next to last paragraph was rearranged by a lack of caffeine. Damn that caffeine!

Reply | Parent | Thread

Cold Echoes

Re: By the way...

from: [info]coldecho
date: May. 18th, 2007 03:47 am (UTC)
Link

Don't damn the caffeine! You might alienate it, forcing it to avoid you in the future... then where would you be?

You'd end up welding an endangered dolphin to a section of bleached coral reef in your caffeine deprived dementia!

We can't have that kind of mix-up!

There are too many exclamation marks in this comment!

Why does caffeine break the rules of I before E?

Where are my giant, alien, zombie lobsters?!

Reply | Parent | Thread

Mari Ness

Re: By the way...

from: [info]mariness
date: May. 18th, 2007 03:49 am (UTC)
Link

I've always made a point of not looking for giant, alien, zombie lobsters.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Ben Ostrowsky

(no subject)

from: [info]sylvar
date: May. 17th, 2007 02:36 pm (UTC)
Link

"Ain't I" is more correct than "aren't I", and yet you never hear grammar teachers recommending it.

To hell with prescriptivist grammarians. There is some nonsense up with which we ought not put. The only relevant question in grammar is "Will the people I'm communicating with understand me and think well of me if I phrase it this way?".

Reply | Thread

Tamar Cunha

(no subject)

from: [info]tamargrl
date: May. 17th, 2007 11:38 pm (UTC)
Link

Now, that's an interesting qualifier: "...and think well of me if I phrase it this way?" I think people too often just think of the first part of your question and assume that a "yes" to that is sufficient.
Interesting, too, is the issue of "who is my target audience?" People with poor language skills only think about the importance of communicating with their peers, but do not take into account the difference in communicating on a social level and communicating on a professional level.

Reply | Parent | Thread

EttyOop

(no subject)

from: [info]loucheroo
date: May. 17th, 2007 11:56 pm (UTC)
Link

Hmmm... I don't communicate differently based on my audience, but I do think about it almost every time. For example, I attempt to avoid the phrasings that irritate the heck out of you, but in general I just speak as I speak. I tend to use proper grammar in general (except that one thing that makes you cringe, and i've been working on that. i promise!), and I speak to a fairly high level. I'm conscious of it, though. You're right -- if I had poor language skills, I would only worry about my peers... because I wouldn't know any better.

And by the way -- the between you and i thing drives me insane as well.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Mari Ness

(no subject)

from: [info]mariness
date: May. 18th, 2007 02:39 am (UTC)
Link

Just so you know, you were responding to [info]tamargrl there, and I have no idea what she thinks about prepositions, or if that particular thing makes her cringe the way it does me.

:)

Reply | Parent | Thread

EttyOop

(no subject)

from: [info]loucheroo
date: May. 19th, 2007 12:13 am (UTC)
Link

*laugh* Oops!

Reply | Parent | Thread

Mari Ness

(no subject)

from: [info]mariness
date: May. 18th, 2007 02:37 am (UTC)
Link

I find "aren't I" grating in pretty much all contexts. I suppose in a casual level it isn't as bad as I think it is -- and "Am I not" does sound stilted -- but in a professional context, AUUGH.

I've been accused of using an overextensive vocabulary among friends, which is probably a just accusation, but I never think of dumbing down.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Mari Ness

(no subject)

from: [info]mariness
date: May. 18th, 2007 02:35 am (UTC)
Link

Grr. "Ain't" isn't even a word!

Amusing saga: back when I was teaching English grammar a student tried to tell me that "ain't" was in the dictionary. I told him to look it up in the American Heritage Dictionary, 3rd edition and read the "usage" note out loud. I probably should have read the note myself before asking him to do so, because the American Heritage Dictionary is not kind on the subject of "ain't" and called it a "mark of illiteracy."

Which then meant that I had to explain what "illiteracy" meant.

Reply | Parent | Thread